Sep 2010, 1842 hrs IST: The Allahabad High Court on Thursday (September 30) ruled by a majority verdict that the disputed land in Ayodhya be divided equally into three parts among Hindus and Muslims and that the place where the makeshift temple of Lord Ram exists belongs to Hindus. In their separate judgements on the sensitive 60-year old title dispute on Ramjanambhoomi-Babri Masjid structure, Justices S U Khan and Sudhir Agarwal said that the area under the central dome of the three-domed structure where Lord Ram's idol exists belongs to Hindus. The majority in the three-judge Lucknow bench also ruled that status quo should be maintained at the disputed place for three months.
Justices Khan and Agarwal decreed that the 2.7 acre land comprising the disputed site should be divided into three equal parts and be given to Sunni Wakf Board, Nirmohi Akhara and the party representing 'Ram Lala Virajman' (Ram deity). However, the third judge Justice D V Sharma ruled that that the disputed site is the birth place of Lord Ram and that the disputed building constructed by Mughal emperor Babur was built against the tenets of Islam and did not have the character of the mosque. Justice Khan said "all the three sets of parties, i.e. Muslims, Hindus and Nirmohi Akhara are declared joint title holders of the property/premises in dispute as described by letters A B C D E F in the map Plan-I prepared by Shri Shiv Shankar Lal, Pleader/Commissioner appointed by court in Suit No. 1 to the extent of 1/3rd share each for using and managing the same for worshipping.
A preliminary decree to this effect is passed." However, the judge observed that it is further declared that the portion below the central dome where at present the idol is kept in makeshift temple will be allotted to Hindus in final decree. He also said that Nirmohi Akhara will be allotted share including that part which is shown by the words 'Ram Chabutra' and 'Sita Rasoi' in the said map. Justice Khan said even though all the three parties are declared to have one-third share each, "however, if while allotting exact portions, some minor adjustments in the share is to be made, then the same will be made and the adversely-affected party may be compensated by some portion of the adjoining land which has been acquired by the central government."
In his gist of findings, Justice Khan observed that the disputed structure was constructed as mosque by or under the orders of Babar but it is not proved by direct evidence that the premises in dispute including constructed portion belonged to Babar or the person who built it. He also said that no temple was demolished for constructing the mosque as it was built over the ruins of temple which was lying for a very long time. In his judgement, Justice Agarwal said "it is declared that the area covered by the central dome of the three-domed structure, i.e., the disputed structure being the deity of Bhagwan Ram Janamsthan and place of birth of Lord Rama as per faith and belief of Hindus belong to plaintiffs (party on behalf of Lord Rama) and shall not be obstructed or interfered in any manner by the defendants."
He also observed that the area within the inner courtyard excepting some portion belongs to members of both the communities, Hindus and Muslims, since it was being used by both since decades and centuries. "It is, however, made clear that the for the purpose of share of plaintiffs (parties on behalf of Lord Rama) under this direction", the area which is covered by central dome of the three-domed structure, shall also be included, he said. Justice Agarwal said the area covered by structures Ram Chabutra, Sita Rasoi and Bhandar in the outer courtyard is declared in the share of Nirmohi Akhara and they shall be entitled to possession thereof, in the absence of any person with better title.
Justice Agarwal said the open area within the outer courtyard shall be shared by Nirmohi Akhara and the party for Lord Rama since it has generally been used by the Hindu people for worship at both places. "It is, however, made clear that the share of Muslim parties shall not be less than one-third of the total area of the premises and if necessary, it may be given some area of outer courtyard. “It is also made clear that while making metes and bounds, if some minor adjustments are to be made with respect to the share of different parties, the affected party may be compensated by allotting the requisite land from the area which is under acquisition of the Government of India," the judge said.
In his findings on issues, Justice Agarwal said the parties of the Muslim side have failed to prove that the property in dispute was constructed by Babar in 1528 AD. Justice Sharma, writing a separate judgement, observed that the disputed site is the birth place of Lord Rama. "Place of birth is a juristic person and is a deity. It is personified as a spirit of divine worshipped as Lord Rama as a child. "Spirit of divine ever remains present everywhere at all times for anyone to invoke at any shape or form in accordance with his own aspirations and it can be shapeless and formless also," he said.
-- TimesNow
- Recent Posts
- Comments
Advertisement
Video
-
India Shinning with Sonia
Lunminthang Haokip In inter-racial tryst with destiny; To later bewail trials of this country; In a noble home that thrived in giving; All that it hard-earned to Nation-building; By faith you ventured to new rules marry, -
A Brief History of St George’s Parish Church, East Ham, London
NAME: St. George is the patron saint of England and St. Ethelbert commemorates death of Christian King outside Hereford, name added in 1935 after generous donation from Diocese of Hereford to new building. -
Twelve Years in England
t was first week of June, 1979 when I arrived at the door of the Holy Cross College, 104 In Ya Road, Rangoon, I think it was around 9 am in the morning, and I came from Mandalay by train. I was received by a student who was cleaning the class rooms -
Hattinneng Hangsing crowned Miss Nagaland 2010
Nineteen year-old Hattinneng Hangsing from Peren district was crowned Miss Nagaland Monday evening in a glittering show held at State Academy Hall, Kohima. Virieno Zakiesato was adjudged first runners-up while Tsukoli Kinimi was adjudged second runner-up. -
A brief history of Lupho, Lupheng, Misao and Related Clans
By Lhunkholal Lupho In view of the fact that most of us are not aware of our true genealogical background, and for our local elders who depend on the memory bank of community -
Adihlou bolna dingin lampi dih aumpoi
Thudih choija nakigel nah em? Nangle nang hitihin gah kidong temmo – Midangho natheitop sunna nakithopi hinam? Natoh dung juija aga loudinga nakigot hinam? Adihle adihlou lhekhenna dinga nalungel nasen hinam? Henge natileh, -
Reformation apat tu chan Houbung dinmun
Lhumlam Roman Catholic lah a chun Monas tery kiti Pathen natong dia ain alou dalha munkhat a kithem chuh-a ahinkho pumpi mangjeng ho hatah-in ahung machal’in, Houbung chu hitobanga kithem chuh ho chun -
Are They Truly Your Friend? How to Tell
A few years ago I penned a quote for my FaceBook page that said, “A genuine friend never says, ‘Call me if you need something.’ They simply do it.”
| If you are interested in submitting Articles | News Item, please enclose with one of your photo | News related Picture of one or two and send it to us at bombielmedia@gmail.com
Featured Posts
Category
Blogroll
- » Judea gam - Esther Sitlhou
- » Thim in lei atom - Esther Sitlhou
- » Liem cheh ute - Esther Sitlhou
- » Aw Bethlehem Lhanghoi - Esther Sitlhou
- » Aw Bethlehem - Esther Sitlhou
- » Limna Nikho - Ngaineilhing Haokip
- » Leiyah ahung pieng - Ngaineilhing Haokip
- » Lal Pen nikho - Ngaineilhing Haokip
- » Lal Lunglhai kum - Ngaineilhing Haokip
- » Huhhing'a Pakai - Ngaineilhing Haokip
- » Chamna Lengpa - Ngaineilhing Haokip
- » Vang eipe diuvin - Esther Sitlhou
- » Lenchung (Kuki Idol)- Kalha ngai jing
- » Lhingboi Singson- Chavang Kolni
- » Lhingboi Singson- Kipah in Nuikhom
- * For more download go here »