26/11 Mumbai attack trial concludes, verdict on May 3

File: In this Nov. 29, 2008 file photo, an Indian soldier takes cover as the Taj Mahal hotel burns during gun battle between Indian military and militants inside the hotel in Mumbai, India. The trial into the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks and the murder of 166 people during the three-day siege closed Wednesday, March 31, less than a year after it opened, a speed rare in the Indian judicial system. (AP Photo)

Mumbai, March 31 (Agencies): The trial in the 26/11 Mumbai attack case against Pakistani gunman Ajmal Kasab and two Indian conspirators concluded on Wednesday, almost a year after it commenced, and the judge will pronounce his verdict on May 3. Special judge M L Tahaliyani reserved his judgement after the prosecution and defence counsels wrapped up their final arguments and would pronounce his verdict on May 3.
If the accused are pronounced guilty, the court would on that day call upon the prosecution and defence lawyers to put forth their arguments on quantum of sentence. The prosecution examined as many as 653 witnesses to prove their case that Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) carried out the dastardly attacks by sending 10 jihadi terrorists from Karachi. The court also examined four witnesses, including two National Security Guard (NSG) commandos, who led the teams in operations to fight the terrorists.
Police had filed the charge sheet in the case on February 26 last year after which the case was committed from magistrate’s court to Sessions Court on March 9, 2009. A separate court was established in high-security Arthur Road central prison here to hear the case. On April 17, before the trial began, Kasab had pleaded that he was a juvenile, but the court rejected his claim after examining prosecution witnesses and experts and ruled that he was over 20 years of age.
On May 8, the first witness stepped into the box, saying he had seen Kasab gunning down sub-inspector Tukaram Ombale at Girgaum Chowpatty. After examining 653 witnesses, including 30 eyewitnesses, special public prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam opened arguments this month, saying there was evidence to suggest that the security apparatus of Pakistan was involved in the attacks on India’s financial nerve centre. Days later, American LeT operative David Headley, in a plea bargain before a Chicago court, disclosed that officers in the Pakistani Army were also behind the conspiracy to strike terror in Mumbai on November 26, 2008.
Nikam argued for 13 days before the trial court and filed a 675-page written submission. Kasab’s counsel K P Pawar argued for three days, while R B Mokashi and Ejaz Naqvi appeared for Faheem Ansari and co-accused Sabauddin Ahmed. aNikam has sought conviction of the accused on various charges under IPC, including waging war against nation, and other laws such as Foreigners Act, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, Prevention of Damage to Public Properties Act, Customs Act, Passport Act, Arms Act, Explosives Act, Explosives Substances Act and Bombay Police Act.

Prosecution lauds FBI help in trial

Mumbai, March 31 (Agencies): The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on Wednesday came in for praise from the prosecution in the Mumbai terror attacks trial for its ‘contribution and cooperation’ to the case. In a warm gesture, Special Public Prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam acknowledged and appreciated the FBI’s help which enabled the prosecution wrap up case against Pakistani terror accused Mohammed Ajmal Amir Kasab and his Indian co-accused, Fahim Ansari and Sabahuddin Ahmed.
When the trial was mid-way, a couple of FBI agents and experts had appeared in camera before the special court, but their names and evidence were not permitted to be made public knowledge. Three others had deposed before the court from the US via video-conferencing, which was also kept off bounds for the media. Nikam said that Kasab and his friends had even tried to destroy the data in the global positioning system (GPS), but with the help of the FBI experts the prosecution was able to retrieve the missing data. Nikam said it was with the co-operation of the FBI that the prosecution was able to wrap up the trial in a record time of 7 months (discounting many holidays and gaps during the period from the appointment of the special judge Jan 13, 2009).
Tags:

About author

Curabitur at est vel odio aliquam fermentum in vel tortor. Aliquam eget laoreet metus. Quisque auctor dolor fermentum nisi imperdiet vel placerat purus convallis.